Recommended Conferences

Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Paris, France
 

Postischemic stunning can affect left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion on post-stress gated sestamibi tomograms

Author(s): Johnson LL, Verdesca SA, Aude WY, Xavier RC, Nott LT, et al.

Abstract

Objectives: This study was designed to investigate whether left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) calculated from post-stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) reflects the basal value for LVEF or whether post-stress LVEF is reduced in some patients with stress-induced ischemia.

Background: Automated programs are now commercially available for assessing global left ventricular (LV) function from post-stress technetium-99m sestamibi gated SPECT performed >15 min after completion of exercise.

Methods: Eighty-one sequential patients who underwent a 2-day stress/rest sestamibi imaging protocol and showed perfusion defects on the post-stress tomogram underwent gated acquisition of the second-day rest tomogram. The post-stress and rest tomographic images were read for presence, location, severity and reversibility of defects by consensus of two to three experienced observers with the aid of circumferential count displays. Defects were scored as mild, moderate or severe and as completely or partially reversible or fixed, and a summed defect severity score was calculated. Of these 81 scans, 20 showed nonreversible perfusion defects (group 3), whereas 61 showed reversible perfusion defects. Post-stress and rest LVEF was calculated from the processed gated SPECT data. From 15 additional patients who underwent rest gated SPECT studies on separate days, serial reproducibility of LVEF values calculated from the gated SPECT data was determined to be +/-5.2%. Coronary angiography was performed within 3 months of the scan without intervening events in 47 of 81 patients, including 39 of 61 with reversible perfusion defects.

Results: In 22 (36%) of 61 patients with reversible perfusion defects, post-stress LVEF was >5% lower than that at rest (group 2), whereas in the remaining 39 patients, post-stress LVEF was either +/-5% or greater than that at rest (group 1). Segmental chordal shortening analysis performed in group 2 studies showed that differences in chordal shortening between rest and post-stress were significantly greater in the reversible perfusion defect territories than in the nonischemic perfusion defect territories ([mean +/- SD] 0.14 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.02 +/- 0.09, respectively, p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences among groups for any of the following variables: age, gender, previous myocardial infarction and type of stress. Time to imaging and stress and scan variables were correlated with the change in LVEF by univariate analysis, and the two variables that correlated significantly were the summed defect reversibility score on the scan and a left anterior descending coronary artery location of the scan defect. Only summed defect reversibility score was significant on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: When the only gated sestamibi scan is the post-stress scan, global and regional LV function will not represent basal LV function in all patients with stress-induced ischemia.

Similar Articles

Physiological basis of clinically used coronary hemodynamic indices

Author(s): Spaan JA, Piek JJ, Hoffman JI, Siebes M

Pressure-flow relations in coronary circulation

Author(s): Hoffman JI, Spaan JA

Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease

Author(s): Libby P, Theroux P

Multicentric inflammation in epicardial coronary arteries of patients dying of acute myocardial infarction

Author(s): Spagnoli LG, Bonanno E, Mauriello A, Palmieri G, Partenzi A, et al.

Chest pain relief by nitroglycerin does not predict active coronary artery disease

Author(s): Henrikson CA, Howell EE, Bush DE, Miles JS, Meininger GR, et al.

Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

Author(s): Gianrossi R, Detrano R, Mulvihill D, Lehmann K, Dubach P, et al.

Effect of myocardial ischemia on cardiac troponin I and T

Author(s): Carlson RJ, Navone A, McConnell JP, Burritt M, Castle MC, et al.

Prevalence and determinants of troponin T elevation in the general population

Author(s): Wallace TW, Abdullah SM, Drazner MH, Das SR, Khera A, et al.

Utility of myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with low-risk treadmill scores

Author(s): Poornima IG, Miller TD, Christian TF, Hodge DO, Bailey KR, et al.

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in myocardial disease

Author(s): Hudsmith LE, Neubauer S

Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience

Author(s): Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Grünenfelder J, et al.

Characteristics of coronary plaques before angiographic progression determined by Multi-Slice CT

Author(s): Leber AW, von Ziegler F, Becker A, Becker CR, Reiser M, et al.

Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography

Author(s): Ropers U, Ropers D, Pflederer T, Anders K, Kuettner A, et al.

Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart

Author(s): Morin RL, Gerber TC, McCollough CH

Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT

Author(s): Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A, Debatin JF, Kerkhoff G, et al.

Prognostic value of dobutamine stress myocardial contrast perfusion echocardiography

Author(s): Tsutsui JM, Elhendy A, Anderson JR, Xie F, McGrain AC, et al.

N Engl J Med 331: 489-495

Author(s): Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, et al.

Major clinical events after coronary stenting

Author(s): Sutton JM, Ellis SG, Roubin GS, Pinkerton CA, King SB 3rd, et al.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease

Author(s): Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, et al.

Coronary revascularization in context

Author(s): Lange RA, Hillis LD

Coronary artery disease in Saudi Arabia

Author(s): Al-Nozha MM, Arafah MR, Al-Mazrou YY, Al-Maatouq MA, Khan NB, et al.

Diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia

Author(s): Al-Nozha MM, Al-Maatouq MA, Al-Mazrou YY, Al-Harthi SS, Arafah MR, et al.

Obesity in Saudi Arabia

Author(s): Al-Nozha MM, Al-Mazrou YY, Al-Maatouq MA, Arafah MR, Khalil MZ, et al.

Metabolic syndrome in Saudi Arabia

Author(s): Al-Nozha M, Al-Khadra A, Arafah MR, Al-Maatouq MA, Khalil MZ, et al.

Hypertension in Saudi Arabia

Author(s): Al-Nozha MM, Abdullah M, Arafah MR, Khalil MZ, Khan NB, et al.

Hyperlipidemia in Saudi Arabia

Author(s): Al-Nozha MM, Arafah MR, Al-Maatouq MA, Khalil MZ, Khan NB, et al.

Interaction between fatness and fitness on CVD risk factors in Asian youth

Author(s): Jekal Y, Kim ES, Im JA, Park JH, Lee MK, et al.

Body fatness and clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors in Portuguese children and adolescents

Author(s): Ribeiro JC, Guerra S, Oliveira J, Andersen LB, Duarte JA, et al.

Changes in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease in the post-discharge period over the decade 1997-2007

Author(s): Pajak A, Jankowski P, Kawecka-Jaszcz K, Surowiec S, Wolfshaut R, et al.

Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation

Author(s): Piepoli MF, Corrá U, Benzer W, Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Dendale P, et al.

Secondary prevention of coronary artery disease in hospital practice over the decade 1996-2006

Author(s): Jankowski P, Kawecka-Jaszcz K, Pajak A, Surowiec S, Wolfshaut R, et al.