Recommended Conferences

Dentistry and Dental Materials

New York, USA
Related Subjects

Bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors to ground versus unground enamel

Author(s): Yazici AR, Yildirim Z, Ertan A, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B, et al.


Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of several self-etch adhesives to their two-step predecessors to ground and unground enamel.

Methods: Seventy-five extracted, non-carious human third molar teeth were selected for this study. The buccal surfaces of each tooth were mechanically ground to obtain flat enamel surfaces (ground enamel), while the lingual surfaces were left intact (unground enamel). The teeth were randomly divided into five groups according to the adhesive systems (n=15): one-step self-etch adhesive - Clearfil S3 Bond, its two-step predecessor - Clearfil SE Bond, one-step self-etch adhesive - AdheSE One, and its two-step predecessor - AdheSE, and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive - Adper Single Bond 2(control). After application of the adhesives to the buccal and lingual enamel surfaces of each tooth, a cylindrical capsule filled with a hybrid composite resin (TPH) was seated against the surfaces. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, followed by thermocy-cling (5°C-55°C/500 cycles). They were subjected to shear bond strength test in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/minute. The data were compared using a two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni test at P<.05.

Results: All adhesives exhibited statistically similar bond strengths to ground and unground enamel except for the etch-and-rinse adhesive that showed significantly higher bond strengths than the self-etch adhesives (P<.05). No significant differences in bond strength values were observed between ground and unground enamel for any of the adhesives tested (P=.17).

Conclusion: Similar bond strengths to ground and unground enamel were achieved with one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors. Enamel preparation did not influence the bonding performance of the adhesives tested.

Similar Articles

Buonocore memorial lecture

Author(s): Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, et al.

Shear bond strength of different adhesive systems to primary dentin and enamel

Author(s): Miranda C, Prates LH, Vieira Rde S, Calvo MC

Bond strength of different adhesive systems to dental hard tissues

Author(s): Yazici AR, Celik C, Ozgünaltay G, Dayangaç B

Resin-enamel bonds made with self-etching primers on ground enamel

Author(s): Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Yoshida E, Hori M, Sano H, et al.

Effect of enamel pretreatments on bond strength of compomer

Author(s): Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL

Microtensilevsmicroshear bond strength of all-in-one adhesives to unground enamel

Author(s): Beloica M, Goracci C, Carvalho CA, Radovic I, Margvelashvili M, et al.

Composite bond strength to enamel with self-etching primers

Author(s): Lopes GC, Marson FC, Vieira LC, de Caldeira AM, Baratieri LN

Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives

Author(s): Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, et al.

Shear bond strength of four filled dentin bonding systems

Author(s): Gallo JR, Comeaux R, Haines B, Xu X, Burgess JO

Bond efficacy and interface morphology of self-etching adhesives to ground enamel

Author(s): Abdalla AI, El Zohairy AA, Abdel Mohsen MM, Feilzer AJ

Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers

Author(s): Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, et al.

Micro-shear bond strength of different adhesives to human dental enamel

Author(s): Nagayassu MP, Shintome LK, Arana-Chavez VE, Fava M

Microtensile bond strength of contemporary adhesives to primary enamel and dentin

Author(s): Marquezan M, da Silveira BL, Burnett LH Jr, Rodrigues CR, Kramer PF