Author(s): Yazici AR, Yildirim Z, Ertan A, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B, et al.
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of several self-etch adhesives to their two-step predecessors to ground and unground enamel.
Methods: Seventy-five extracted, non-carious human third molar teeth were selected for this study. The buccal surfaces of each tooth were mechanically ground to obtain flat enamel surfaces (ground enamel), while the lingual surfaces were left intact (unground enamel). The teeth were randomly divided into five groups according to the adhesive systems (n=15): one-step self-etch adhesive - Clearfil S3 Bond, its two-step predecessor - Clearfil SE Bond, one-step self-etch adhesive - AdheSE One, and its two-step predecessor - AdheSE, and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive - Adper Single Bond 2(control). After application of the adhesives to the buccal and lingual enamel surfaces of each tooth, a cylindrical capsule filled with a hybrid composite resin (TPH) was seated against the surfaces. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, followed by thermocy-cling (5°C-55°C/500 cycles). They were subjected to shear bond strength test in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/minute. The data were compared using a two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni test at P<.05.
Results: All adhesives exhibited statistically similar bond strengths to ground and unground enamel except for the etch-and-rinse adhesive that showed significantly higher bond strengths than the self-etch adhesives (P<.05). No significant differences in bond strength values were observed between ground and unground enamel for any of the adhesives tested (P=.17).
Conclusion: Similar bond strengths to ground and unground enamel were achieved with one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors. Enamel preparation did not influence the bonding performance of the adhesives tested.
Referred From: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22904656
Author(s): Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, et al.
Author(s): Miranda C, Prates LH, Vieira Rde S, Calvo MC
Author(s): Yazici AR, Celik C, Ozgünaltay G, Dayangaç B
Author(s): Paradella TC, Fava M
Author(s): El Zohairy AA, Saber MH, Abdalla AI, Feilzer AJ
Author(s): Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Yoshida E, Hori M, Sano H, et al.
Author(s): Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL
Author(s): Beloica M, Goracci C, Carvalho CA, Radovic I, Margvelashvili M, et al.
Author(s): Lopes GC, Marson FC, Vieira LC, de Caldeira AM, Baratieri LN
Author(s): Ebrahimi SF, Shadman N, Abrishami A
Author(s): Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, et al.
Author(s): Stockton LW, Tsang ST
Author(s): Braga RR, Cesar PF, Gonzaga CC
Author(s): Gallo JR, Comeaux R, Haines B, Xu X, Burgess JO
Author(s): Atash R, Van den Abbeele A
Author(s): Pashley DH, Tay FR
Author(s): Abdalla AI, El Zohairy AA, Abdel Mohsen MM, Feilzer AJ
Author(s): Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, et al.
Author(s): Nagayassu MP, Shintome LK, Arana-Chavez VE, Fava M
Author(s): Marquezan M, da Silveira BL, Burnett LH Jr, Rodrigues CR, Kramer PF
Author(s): Perdigão J, May KN Jr, Wilder AD Jr, Lopes M
Author(s): Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK