Recommended Conferences

Dentistry and Dental Materials

New York, USA
Related Subjects
 

Efficacy of microtensile versus microshear bond testing for evaluation of bond strength of dental adhesive systems to enamel

Author(s): El Zohairy AA, Saber MH, Abdalla AI, Feilzer AJ

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of the microtensile bond test (microTBS) and the microshear bond test (microSBS) in ranking four dental adhesives according to bond strength to enamel and identify the modes of failure involved.

Materials and methods: Forty-four caries-free human molars were randomly assigned to one of two bond strength testing methods: 20 teeth were used for microTBS test and 24 teeth for microSBS test. Flat enamel surfaces were created by wet grinding. Four adhesive systems were applied to the ground enamel surfaces; a two-step self-etch (Clearfil SE Bond, SEB), two all-in-one self-etch (Adper Prompt L-Pop, APL; Hybrid Bond, HB) and a two-step etch-and-rinse (Adper Single Bond, ASB). Resin composite (Z100) was applied over the adhesive. The microTBS and microSBS were determined after 24h of storage in water at 37 degrees C. The mode of failure was determined by light microscope and SEM. Data was analyzed with ANOVA, Tukey's and Chi-square tests.

Results: microTBS test ranked the adhesives as follows: SEB=ASB=APL>HB, while microSBS test ranked the adhesives as follows: ASB>SEB=APL>HB. The highest percentage failure mode with microTBS testing was cohesive in enamel or at the DEJ: SEB (95%), APL (65%) and ASB (65%). As for HB, adhesive failure (95%) was the common finding. The predominant failure mode in case of the microSBS was adhesive (APL 50%, SEB 58.3%, ASB 75% and HB 91.7%).

Significance: Ranking appears to be test-dependant and microSBS test appears to be more accurate in differentiating among the stronger adhesives.

Similar Articles

Buonocore memorial lecture

Author(s): Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, et al.

Shear bond strength of different adhesive systems to primary dentin and enamel

Author(s): Miranda C, Prates LH, Vieira Rde S, Calvo MC

Bond strength of different adhesive systems to dental hard tissues

Author(s): Yazici AR, Celik C, Ozgünaltay G, Dayangaç B

Resin-enamel bonds made with self-etching primers on ground enamel

Author(s): Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Yoshida E, Hori M, Sano H, et al.

Effect of enamel pretreatments on bond strength of compomer

Author(s): Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL

Microtensilevsmicroshear bond strength of all-in-one adhesives to unground enamel

Author(s): Beloica M, Goracci C, Carvalho CA, Radovic I, Margvelashvili M, et al.

Bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors to ground versus unground enamel

Author(s): Yazici AR, Yildirim Z, Ertan A, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B, et al.

Composite bond strength to enamel with self-etching primers

Author(s): Lopes GC, Marson FC, Vieira LC, de Caldeira AM, Baratieri LN

Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives

Author(s): Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, et al.

Shear bond strength of four filled dentin bonding systems

Author(s): Gallo JR, Comeaux R, Haines B, Xu X, Burgess JO

Bond efficacy and interface morphology of self-etching adhesives to ground enamel

Author(s): Abdalla AI, El Zohairy AA, Abdel Mohsen MM, Feilzer AJ

Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers

Author(s): Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, et al.

Micro-shear bond strength of different adhesives to human dental enamel

Author(s): Nagayassu MP, Shintome LK, Arana-Chavez VE, Fava M

Microtensile bond strength of contemporary adhesives to primary enamel and dentin

Author(s): Marquezan M, da Silveira BL, Burnett LH Jr, Rodrigues CR, Kramer PF