Recommended Conferences

Cancer-Treatment and Therapeutics

New York, USA
Related Subjects

Bile acids as carcinogens in human gastrointestinal cancers

Author(s): Bernstein H, Bernstein C, Payne CM, Dvorakova K, Garewal H


Bile acids were first proposed to be carcinogens in 1939 and 1940. On the basis of later work with rodent models, bile acids came to be regarded as cancer promoters rather than carcinogens. However, considerable indirect evidence, obtained more recently, supports the view that bile acids are carcinogens in humans. At least 15 reports, from 1980 through 2003, indicate that bile acids cause DNA damage. The mechanism is probably indirect, involving induction of oxidative stress and production of reactive oxygen species that then damage DNA. Repeated DNA damage likely increases the mutation rate, including the mutation rate of tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes. Additional reports, from 1994 through 2002, indicate that bile acids, at the increased concentrations accompanying a high fat diet, induce frequent apoptosis. Those cells within the exposed population with reduced apoptosis capability tend to survive and selectively proliferate. That bile acids cause DNA damage and may select for apoptosis-resistant cells (both leading to increased mutation), indicates that bile acids are likely carcinogens. In humans, an increased incidence of cancer of the laryngopharyngeal tract, esophagus, stomach, pancreas, the small intestine (near the Ampulla of Vater) and the colon are associated with high levels of bile acids. The much larger number of cell generations in the colonic (and, likely, other gastrointestinal) epithelia of humans compared to rodents may allow time for induction and selection of mutations leading to cancer in humans, although not in rodents.

Similar Articles

Gut microbiota role in dietary protein metabolism and health-related outcomes: The two sides of the coin

Author(s): Portune KJ, Beaumont M, Davila AM, Tomé D, Blachier F, Sanz Y

Deoxycholic and chenodeoxycholic bile acids induce apoptosis via oxidative stress in human colon adenocarcinoma cells

Author(s): Ignacio BJ, Olmo N, Perez-Ramos P, Santiago-Gómez A, Lecona E, Turnay J, et al

Intestinal bile acid physiology and pathophysiology

Author(s): Martínez-Augustin O, Sánchez de Medina F

Dose-dependent antiinflammatory effect of ursodeoxycholic acid in experimental colitis

Author(s): Martínez-Moya P, Romero-Calvo I, Requena P, Hernández-Chirlaque C, Aranda CJ, González R, et al

Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on bile acid profiles and intestinal detoxification machinery in primary biliary cirrhosis and health

Author(s): Dilger K, Hohenester S, Winkler-Budenhofer U, Bastiaansen BAJ, Schaap FG, Rust C, et al

Bile acids regulate intestinal cell proliferation by modulating EGFR and FXR signaling

Author(s): Dossa AY, Escobar O, Golden J, Frey MR, Ford HF, Gayer CP

A regulatory cascade of the nuclear receptors FXR, SHP-1, and LRH-1 represses bile acid biosynthesis

Author(s): Goodwin B, Jones SA, Price RR, Watson MA, McKee DD, Moore LB, et al

Effects of chenodeoxycholate and a bile acid sequestrant, colesevelam, on intestinal transit and bowel function

Author(s): Odunsi-Shiyanbade ST, Camilleri M, McKinzie S, Burton D, Carlson P, Busciglio IP, et al

Increase in fecal primary bile acids and dysbiosis in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome

Author(s): Duboc H, Rainteau D, Rajca S, Humbert L, Farabos D, Maubert M, et al

Connecting dysbiosis, bile-acid dysmetabolism and gut inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases

Author(s): Duboc H, Rajca S, Rainteau D, Benarous D, Maubert MA, Quervain E, et al