Author(s): Marcantonio ER, Goldman L, Mangione CM, Ludwig LE, Muraca B, et al.
Objective: To develop and validate a clinical prediction rule for postoperative delirium using data available to clinicians preoperatively.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: General surgery, orthopedic surgery, and gynecology services at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Patients: Consenting patients older than 50 years admitted for major elective noncardiac surgery between November 1, 1990, and March 15, 1992 (N = 1341).
Measurements: All patients underwent preoperative evaluations, including a medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and assessments of physical and cognitive function using the Specific Activity Scale and the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status. Postoperative delirium was diagnosed using the Confusion Assessment Method or using data from the medical record and the hospital's nursing intensity index. Patients were followed up for the duration of hospitalization to determine major complication rates, length of stay, and discharge disposition.
Results: Postoperative delirium occurred in 117 (9%) of the 1341 patients studied. Independent correlates included age 70 years or older; self-reported alcohol abuse; poor cognitive status; poor functional status; markedly abnormal preoperative serum sodium, potassium, or glucose level; noncardiac thoracic surgery; and aortic aneurysm surgery. Using these seven preoperative factors, a simple predictive rule was developed. In an independent population, the rule stratified patients into groups with low (2%), medium (8%, 13%), and high (50%) rates of postoperative delirium. Patients who developed delirium had higher rates of major complications, longer lengths of stay, and higher rates of discharge to long-term care or rehabilitative facilities.
Conclusions: Using data available preoperatively, clinicians can stratify patients into risk groups for the development of delirium. Since delirium is associated with a variety of adverse outcomes, patients with substantial risk for this complication could be candidates for interventions to reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium and potentially improve overall surgical outcomes.
Referred From: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8264068
Author(s): Selby JV, Ray GT, Zhang D, Colby CJ
Author(s): Sidorov J, Shull R, Tomcavage J, Girolami S, Lawton N, et al.
Author(s): Cutajar J
Author(s): Costa J, Borges M, David C, Vaz Carneiro A
Author(s): IDF Clinical Guidelines Task Force
Author(s): Lakka HM, Laaksonen DE, Lakka TA, Niskanen LK, Kumpusalo E, et al.
Author(s): Selby JV, Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Ferrara A, Liu J
Author(s): The Mount Hood 4 Modeling Group
Author(s): Clark CM Jr, Snyder JW, Meek RL, Stutz LM, Parkin CG
Author(s): Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, et al.
Author(s): Carr MC, Brunzell JD
Author(s): van Leiden HA, Dekker JM, Moll AC, Nijpels G, Heine RJ, et al.
Author(s): Stevens RJ, Kothari V, Adler AI, Stratton IM; United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group
Author(s): Serrano Rios M
Author(s): Adler AI, Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH, Stensel V, Forsberg RC, et al.
Author(s): Retnakaran R, Cull CA, Thorne KI, Adler AI, Holman RR
Author(s): Adler AI, Stratton IM, Neil HA, Yudkin JS, Matthews DR, et al.
Author(s): Bakris GL, Williams M, Dworkin L, Elliott WJ, Epstein M, et al.
Author(s): Ravid M, Brosh D, Ravid-Safran D, Levy Z, Rachmani R
Author(s): Park JY, Kim HK, Chung YE, Kim SW, Hong SK, et al.
Author(s): Tuomilehto J, Rastenyte D, Birkenhäger WH, Thijs L, Antikainen R, et al.
Author(s): Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, Dahlöf B, Elmfeldt D, et al.
Author(s): Curb JD, Pressel SL, Cutler JA, Savage PJ, Applegate WB, et al.
Author(s): Anderson JW, Kendall CW, Jenkins DJ
Author(s): Metascreen Writing Committee, Bonadonna R, Cucinotta D, Fedele D, Riccardi G, et al.
Author(s): Costa LA, Canani LH, Lisbôa HR, Tres GS, Gross GL
Author(s): Handelsman Y, Jellinger PS
Author(s): Bonora E, Targher G, Formentini G, Calcaterra F, Lombardi S, et al.