Computer modeling of diabetes and its complications

Author(s): The Mount Hood 4 Modeling Group

Abstract

Computer simulation models are mathematical equations combined in a structured framework to represent some real or hypothetical system. One of their uses is to allow the projection of short-term data from clinical trials to evaluate clinical outcomes and costs over a long-term period. This technology is becoming increasingly important to assist decision making in modern medicine in situations where there is a paucity of long-term clinical trial data, as recently acknowledged in the American Diabetes Association Consensus Panel Guidelines for Computer Modeling of Diabetes and its Complications. The Mount Hood Challenge Meetings provide a forum for computer modelers of diabetes to discuss and compare models and identify key areas of future development to advance the field. The Fourth Mount Hood Challenge in 2004 was the first meeting of its kind to ask modelers to perform simulations of outcomes for patients in published clinical trials, allowing comparison against "real life" data. Eight modeling groups participated in the challenge. Each group was given three of the following challenges: to simulate a trial of type 2 diabetes (CARDS [Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study]); to simulate a trial of type 1 diabetes (DCCT [Diabetes Control and Complications Trial]); and to calculate outcomes for a hypothetical, precisely specified patient (cross-model validation). The results of the models varied from each other and for methodological reasons, in some cases, from the published trial data in important ways. This approach of performing systematic comparisons and validation exercises has enabled the identification of key differences among the models, as well as their possible causes and directions for improvement in the future.

Similar Articles

Global guidelines for type 2 diabetes

Author(s): IDF Clinical Guidelines Task Force

The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men

Author(s): Lakka HM, Laaksonen DE, Lakka TA, Niskanen LK, Kumpusalo E, et al.

A clinical prediction rule for delirium after elective noncardiac surgery

Author(s): Marcantonio ER, Goldman L, Mangione CM, Ludwig LE, Muraca B, et al.

Blood pressure, lipids, and obesity are associated with retinopathy: the hoorn study

Author(s): van Leiden HA, Dekker JM, Moll AC, Nijpels G, Heine RJ, et al.

The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in Type II diabetes (UKPDS 56)

Author(s): Stevens RJ, Kothari V, Adler AI, Stratton IM; United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group

Risk factors for diabetic peripheral sensory neuropathy

Author(s): Adler AI, Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH, Stensel V, Forsberg RC, et al.

Risk factors for renal dysfunction in type 2 diabetes: U

Author(s): Retnakaran R, Cull CA, Thorne KI, Adler AI, Holman RR

Preserving renal function in adults with hypertension and diabetes: a consensus approach

Author(s): Bakris GL, Williams M, Dworkin L, Elliott WJ, Epstein M, et al.

Incidence and determinants of microalbuminuria in Koreans with type 2 diabetes

Author(s): Park JY, Kim HK, Chung YE, Kim SW, Hong SK, et al.

Effects of calcium-channel blockade in older patients with diabetes and systolic hypertension

Author(s): Tuomilehto J, Rastenyte D, Birkenhäger WH, Thijs L, Antikainen R, et al.

The Metabolic Syndrome is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetic subjects

Author(s): Bonora E, Targher G, Formentini G, Calcaterra F, Lombardi S, et al.