Targeting postprandial hyperglycemia: a comparative study of insulinotropic agents in type 2 diabetes

Author(s): Carroll MF, Gutierrez A, Castro M, Tsewang D, Schade DS


This study was designed to compare the efficacy of three insulinotropic agents in the control of postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. Fifteen subjects with noninsulin-requiring type 2 diabetes were admitted to the General Clinical Research Center on four separate occasions. During the control study and following 7-10 d on each study medication, daylong glucose profiles were performed to investigate the effects of the assigned medication on postprandial hyperglycemia. During each admission, placebo or study medications were administered before three isocaloric meals as follows: immediate-release glipizide 30 min before breakfast and 30 min before supper, glipizide gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) 30 min before breakfast, or nateglinide 120 mg 10 min before breakfast, before lunch, and before supper. Blood was drawn for analysis of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide at -0.05, 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h relative to each test meal. Immediate-release glipizide, nateglinide, or glipizide GITS administration resulted in significantly lower integrated daylong (glucose area under the curve) and peak glucose levels, compared with placebo. There were no significant differences in the daylong integrated glucose levels among the three study medications. The peak postbreakfast glucose level (but not glucose area under the curve) was lower with nateglinide, compared with either immediate-release glipizide or glipizide GITS. Postlunch and postdinner integrated glucose levels were significantly lower with immediate-release glipizide or glipizide GITS, compared with nateglinide. C-peptide levels were significantly higher with immediate-release glipizide, compared with glipizide GITS. Insulin levels did not differ among the three study medications. Once-daily glipizide GITS, twice-daily immediate-release glipizide, or three-times-a-day administration of nateglinide results in equivalent control of postmeal hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. The decision to prescribe one of these three insulinotropic agents should be based on factors such as the patient's ability to comply with complex dosing regimens, the need to control fasting hyperglycemia, the risk of interprandial hypoglycemia, and pharmacoeconomic considerations, rather than postprandial glucose-lowering efficacy.

Similar Articles

Chemistry and biochemistry of type 2 diabetes

Author(s): Ross SA, Gulve EA, Wang M

Medicinal plants of India with anti-diabetic potential

Author(s): Grover JK, Yadav S, Vats V

Antidiarrhoeal activity of Acacia nilotica Willd

Author(s): Misar A, Bhagat R, Mujumdar AM

Antioxidant and anti-quorum sensing activities of green pod of Acacia nilotica L

Author(s): Singh BN, Singh BR, Singh RL, Prakash D, Sarma BK, et al.

In vitro survey of alpha-glucosidase inhibitory food components

Author(s): Matsui T, Yoshimoto C, Osajima K, Oki T, Osajima Y

Antidiabetic principles of natural medicines

Author(s): Matsuda H, Murakami T, Yashiro K, Yamahara J, Yoshikawa M

Kinetic and structural characterization of the glutathione-binding site of Aldose reductase

Author(s): Dixit BL, Balendiran GK, Watowich SJ, Srivastava S, Ramana KV, et al.

Characterization of the glutathione binding site of aldose reductase

Author(s): Ramana KV, Dixit BL, Srivastava S, Bhatnagar A, Balendiran GK, et al.