A comprehensive review of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT)

Author(s): Tombaugh TN

Abstract

The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) was developed to assess the effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) on cognitive functioning. Subsequent research has shown that the PASAT has clinical utility in detecting impairments in cognitive processing in patients with a wide variety of neuropsychological syndromes. Gronwall and Sampson (1974) originally assumed the PASAT measured speed of information processing. However, the PASAT is now recognized as a measure of multiple functional domains because it requires the successful completion of a variety of cognitive functions, primarily those related to attention. While the PASAT has demonstrated good psychometric properties such as high levels of internal consistency and test-retest reliability, several issues should be considered when administering and interpreting this test. For example, test-retest scores show that the PASAT is extremely susceptible to practice effects. The PASAT is also negatively affected by increasing age, decreasing IQ, and low math ability. Administration of the PASAT creates an undue amount of anxiety and frustration in participants which affects their performance on this and other neuropsychological tests, and may subsequently increase their reluctance to return for follow up testing. Demands for rapid responding place individuals with speech or language impairment at a distinct disadvantage, as it does for those who naturally speak slowly for cultural or geographic reasons. In conclusion, the PASAT represents a reliable test that has legitimate but restricted clinical applications. A low score on the PASAT may not necessarily indicate or confirm the presence of neurological pathology. The PASAT is a highly sensitive, non-specific test and as such, care must be taken to identify the reasons underlying any low score before interpreting it as clinically significant.

Similar Articles

Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis

Author(s): Rao SM, Leo GJ, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F

Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis

Author(s): Hoffmann S, Tittgemeyer M, von Cramon DY

Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis

Author(s): Chiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J

Processing speed interacts with working memory efficiency in multiple sclerosis

Author(s): Lengenfelder J, Bryant D, Diamond BJ, Kalmar JH, Moore NB, et al.

Practice effects with the NIMH AIDS abbreviated neuropsychological battery

Author(s): McCaffrey RJ, Cousins JP, Westervelt HJ, Martynowicz M, Remick SC, et al.

fMRI evidence of brain reorganization during attention and memory tasks in multiple sclerosis

Author(s): Mainero C, Caramia F, Pozzilli C, Pisani A, Pestalozza I, et al.

Compensatory cortical activation observed in fMRI during a cognitive task at the earliest stage of MS

Author(s): Audoin B, Ibarrola D, Ranjeva JP, Confort-Gouny S, Malikova I et al.

Activation patterns in multiple sclerosis on the Computerized Tests of Information Processing

Author(s): Smith AM, Walker LA, Freedman MS, Berrigan LI, St Pierre J, et al.

Cognition in patients with multiple sclerosis After four years

Author(s): Jennekens-Schinkel A, Laboyrie PM, Lanser JB, van der Velde EA

Association of neocortical volume changes with cognitive deterioration in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Author(s): Amato MP, Portaccio E, Goretti B, Zipoli V, Battaglini M, et al.

Meaningful change in cognition in multiple sclerosis: method matters

Author(s): Walker LA, Mendella PD, Stewart A, Freedman MS, Smith AM

A longitudinal study of cognition in primary progressive multiple sclerosis

Author(s): Camp SJ, Stevenson VL, Thompson AJ, Ingle GT, Miller DH, et al.