Author(s): Hohol MJ, Orav EJ, Weiner HL
Current clinical scales in multiple sclerosis (MS) are often complicated to administer, suffer from interrater variability and lack of uniform representation across grades, and are insensitive to progression at certain stages. Furthermore, they are not easily applied by neurologists and do not clearly differentiate among functional stages of MS. For these reasons, we developed Disease Steps to assess disability in MS. A total of 1,323 patients were classified using both Disease Steps and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) for a total of 2,755 assessments. The Disease Steps scale consists of 0 = Normal; 1 = Mild disability, mild symptoms or signs; 2 = Moderate disability, visible abnormality of gait; 3 = Early cane, intermittent use of cane; 4 = Late cane, cane-dependent; 5 = Bilateral support; 6 = Confined to wheelchair; and U = Unclassifiable. Results demonstrate that raters could simply and quickly categorize patients using Disease Steps. Patients were uniformly distributed with Disease Steps, whereas a bimodal distribution occurred with the EDSS. On the EDSS, 40.3% of patients scored between 1.0 and 3.5 and 36.0% scored from 6.0 to 6.5, with only 6.9% of patients scoring between 4.0 and 5.5. For 60 patients seen by two neurologists, concordance between raters was excellent for Disease Steps (kappa = 0.8) but only moderate for the EDSS (kappa = 0.54). As a simple and reproducible measure of different functional steps of MS, Disease Steps can be used as a guide in therapeutic decision-making, following response to therapy, and in assessing disease progression.
Referred From: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7854521/
Author(s): Nocentini U, Tedeschi G, Migliaccio R, Dinacci D, Lavorgna L, et al.
Author(s): Ghaffar O, Feinstein A
Author(s): Minden SL
Author(s): Feinstein A, Feinstein K
Author(s): Nortvedt MW, Riise T
Author(s): Mittleman MA, Maclure M, Sherwood JB, Mulry RP, Tofler GH, et al.
Author(s): van Middendorp H, Geenen R, Sorbi MJ, Hox JJ, Vingerhoets AJ, et al.
Author(s): Lopes PN, Salovey P, Coté S, Beers M
Author(s): Gross JJ
Author(s): Abel GM
Author(s): Gerin W, Davidson KW, Christenfeld NJ, Goyal T, Schwartz JE
Author(s): Rusting CL, Nolen-Hoeksema S
Author(s): van Middendorp H, Lumley MA, Moerbeek M, Jacobs JW, Bijlsma JW, et al.
Author(s): Fernandez E, Turk DC
Author(s): Okifuji A, Turk DC, Curran SL
Author(s): Lima FS, Simioni S, Bruggimann L, Ruffieux C, Dudler J, et al.
Author(s): Feinstein A
Author(s): Siegert RJ, Abernethy DA
Author(s): Minden SL, Orav J, Reich P
Author(s): Deschênes SS, Dugas MJ, Fracalanza K, Koerner N
Author(s): Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA
Author(s): Alshubaili AF, Awadalla AW, Ohaeri JU, Mabrouk AA
Author(s): Phillips LH, Henry JD, Hosie JA, Milne AB
Author(s): Kurtzke JF
Author(s): Learmonth YC, Motl RW, Sandroff BM, Pula JH, Cadavid D
Author(s): Phillips LH, Henry JD, Nouzova E, Cooper C, Radlak B, et al.
Author(s): Phillips LH, Henry JD, Scott C, Summers F, Whyte M, et al.
Author(s): Phillips LH, Saldias A, McCarrey A, Henry JD, Scott C, et al.