Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome

Author(s): Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, et al.

Abstract

Background:Subjects with a mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have a memory impairment beyond that expected for age and education yet are not demented. These subjects are becoming the focus of many prediction studies and early intervention trials.

Objective:To characterize clinically subjects with MCI cross-sectionally and longitudinally.

Design:A prospective, longitudinal inception cohort.

Setting:General community clinic.

Participants:A sample of 76 consecutively evaluated subjects with MCI were compared with 234 healthy control subjects and 106 patients with mild Alzheimer disease (AD), all from a community setting as part of the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's Disease Center/Alzheimer's Disease Patient Registry, Rochester, Minn.

Main outcome measures:The 3 groups of individuals were compared on demographic factors and measures of cognitive function including the Mini-Mental State Examination, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised, Dementia Rating Scale, Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, and Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Clinical classifications of dementia and AD were determined according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition and the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria, respectively.

Results:The primary distinction between control subjects and subjects with MCI was in the area of memory, while other cognitive functions were comparable. However, when the subjects with MCI were compared with the patients with very mild AD, memory performance was similar, but patients with AD were more impaired in other cognitive domains as well. Longitudinal performance demonstrated that the subjects with MCI declined at a rate greater than that of the controls but less rapidly than the patients with mild AD.

Conclusions:Patients who meet the criteria for MCI can be differentiated from healthy control subjects and those with very mild AD. They appear to constitute a clinical entity that can be characterized for treatment interventions.

Similar Articles

Mild cognitive impairment: an overview

Author(s): Petersen RC, Negash S

Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment

Author(s): Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, Mohs RC, Morris JC, et al.

Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later

Author(s): Petersen RC, Roberts RO, Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Geda YE, et al.

Feasibility of lumbar puncture in the study of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: a multicenter study in Spain

Author(s): Alcolea D, Martínez-Lage P, Izagirre A, Clerigué M, Carmona-Iragui M, et al.

The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: an fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks

Author(s): Linden DE, Prvulovic D, Formisano E, Völlinger M, Zanella FE, et al.

Usefulness of p300 in subjective memory complaints: a prospective study

Author(s): Gironell A, García-Sánchez C, Estévez-González A, Boltes A, Kulisevsky J

P300 latency and amplitude in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review

Author(s): Pedroso RV, Fraga FJ, Corazza DI, Andreatto CA, Coelho FG, et al.

Usefulness of event-related potentials in the assessment of mild cognitive impairment

Author(s): Papaliagkas V, Kimiskidis V, Tsolaki M, Anogianakis G

Cognitive event-related potentials: longitudinal changes in mild cognitive impairment

Author(s): Papaliagkas VT, Kimiskidis VK, Tsolaki MN, Anogianakis G