Author(s): Chen YN, Mitra S, Schlaghecken F
Objective:The N-back task is frequently used in working memory studies. N-parameters allow experimental psychologists to analyze the sub-processes of N-back tasks in addition to general processing. However, previous imaging studies have not closely scrutinized these sub-processes. In the current study, three sub-processes in the N-back task were proposed using a logical task analysis: matching, replacement and shift. Domain-specific lateralization in spatial and verbal working memory was investigated in terms of this model.
Methods:This model was tested with two ERP experiments during N-back tasks, one conceptual (top-down) and one data-driven (bottom-up).
Results:Domain-specific lateralization was observed as predicted in the shift sub-process of the conceptual task and in the replacement sub-process of the data-driven task. Match-specific lateralization was also found.
Conclusions:The results support our three-sub-process model of the N-back task and our hypothesis that replacement is a data-driven process with a posterior locus whereas shift is a more conceptual process with a more frontal locus.
Significance:The proposed model correctly predicted ERP patterns in conceptual and data-driven N-back tasks and is potentially useful in understanding the neurophysiologic basis of N-back task performance. The similarity between match- and domain-specific lateralization in N-back tasks raised several issues for further investigation.
Referred From: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18448388
Author(s): Singh B, Kaur P, Gopichand, Singh RD, Ahuja PS
Author(s): Jang CH, Cho YB, Choi CH
Author(s): Qiu F, Friesen JB, McAlpine JB, Pauli GF
Author(s): Xiang Z, Wu-fang Z, Dong-feng Z, Chen da C, Xiu MH, et al.
Author(s): Abdel-Wahab BA, Abd El-Aziz SM
Author(s): Nada SE, Shah ZA
Author(s): He Z, Liao Y, Zheng M, Zeng FD, Guo LJ
Author(s): Osvaldo G , Giovanna P , Maria C
Author(s): Barreiro KA, Suárez LD, Lynch VM, Molina VA, Delorenzi A
Author(s): Luo YX, Xue YX, Shen HW, Lu L
Author(s): Thullier F, Lepelley MC, Lestienne FG
Author(s): Stahlhut L, Grotemeyer KH2, Husstedt IW1, Evers S3
Author(s): Szalma I, Kiss A, Kardos L, Horváth G, Nyitrai E, et al.
Author(s): Evans JG, Wilcock G, Birks J
Author(s): Chatterjie N, Alexander G, Wang H
Author(s): Güngör L, Terzi M, Onar MK
Author(s): Yang JF, Zhou DY, Liang ZY
Author(s): Ding S, Dudley E, Plummer S, Tang J, Newton RP, et al.
Author(s): Kotil K, Turgay B, Tugrul T, Ton T, Kucukhuseyin C, et al.
Author(s): Mahadevan S, Park Y
Author(s): Kennedy DO, Scholey AB, Wesnes KA
Author(s): Droy-Lefaix MT
Author(s): Ryu KH, Han HY, Lee SY, Jeon SD, Im GJ, et al.
Author(s): Cohen-Salmon C, Venault P, Martin B, Raffalli-Sébille MJ, Barkats M, et al.
Author(s): Persson J, Bringlöv E, Nilsson LG, Nyberg L
Author(s): Zhang SJ, Xue ZY
Author(s): García-Cabeza I, de Blas MM, Epifanio MM, de Chávez MG
Author(s): de Jongh R, Bolt I, Schermer M, Olivier B
Author(s): Jardel G, Villarinho B, Kelly de V, Pinheirfrancielle D, Oliveira SM, Machado P, et al.