Author(s): Huitema RB, Brouwer WH, Hof AL, Dekker R, Mulder T, et al.
A lateral deviation of the walking trajectory is often observed in stroke patients with unilateral spatial neglect. However, existing research appears to be contradictory regarding the direction of this deviation. The aim of the present study was to gain more insight into the walking trajectory of neglect patients. Twelve right hemisphere stroke patients (six neglect, six no neglect), eight left hemisphere stroke patients (none neglect) and 10 healthy control subjects were instructed to walk towards a target while a two-dimensional ultrasonic positioning system recorded their walking trajectory. Patients' recovery of walking ability was assessed and they were tested for the presence of neglect. Neglect patients showed a larger lateral deviation in their walking trajectory compared to stroke patients without neglect or controls. Neglect patients with good walking ability showed a deviation to the contralesional side. Neglect patients with limited walking ability showed a deviation to the ipsilesional side. Within the neglect group we found no relation between the severity of neglect and lateral deviation. Differences in walking ability may account for the contradictory results between studies regarding the lateral deviation in neglect patients' walking trajectory. We suggest that when a neglect patient's walking ability is limited, walking towards a target becomes a dual task: heading control and walking. A limited walking ability will cause a higher task priority of walking compared to heading control. This shift in task priority may be causing the change in walking trajectory deviation.
Referred From: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16399516
Author(s): Sarre G, Berard J, Fung J, Lamontagne A
Author(s): Warren WH Jr, Kay BA, Zosh WD, Duchon AP, Sahuc S
Author(s): Berard J, Fung J, Lamontagne A
Author(s): Rowe F, Brand D, Jackson CA, Price A, Walker L, et al.
Author(s): Lamontagne A, Fung J
Author(s): Imai T, Moore ST, Raphan T, Cohen B
Author(s): Vaina LM, Sikoglu EM, Soloviev S, LeMay M, Squatrito S, et al.
Author(s): Billino J, Braun DI, Böhm KD, Bremmer F, Gegenfurtner KR
Author(s): Lamontagne A, Fung J, McFadyen B, Faubert J
Author(s): Lamontagne A, Fung J, McFadyen B, Faubert J, Paquette C
Author(s): Bisiach E, Bulgarelli C, Sterzi R, Vallar G
Author(s): Tombaugh TN
Author(s): Walker ML, Austin AG, Banke GM, Foxx SR, Gaetano L, et al.
Author(s): Barton JJ, Sharpe JA, Raymond JE
Author(s): Schenk T, Zihl J
Author(s): Zihl J, von Cramon D, Mai N, Schmid C
Author(s): Harris JM, Bonas W
Author(s): Rushton SK, Harris JM, Lloyd MR, Wann JP
Author(s): Turton AJ, Dewar SJ, Lievesley A, O'Leary K, Gabb J, et al.
Author(s): Berti A, Smania N, Rabuffetti M, Ferrarin M, Spinazzola L, et al.
Author(s): Robertson IH, Tegner R, Goodrich SJ, Wilson C
Author(s): Fordell H, Bodin K, Bucht G, Malm J
Author(s): Cowey A, Small M, Ellis S
Author(s): Keller I, Schindler I, Kerkhoff G, von Rosen F, Golz D
Author(s): Keller I, Schindler I, Kerkhoff G, von Rosen F, Golz D
Author(s): Karnath HO, Rorden C
Author(s): Fruhmann Berger M, Johannsen L, Karnath HO