Recommended Conferences

Psychology and Mental Health

Chicago, USA
Related Subjects
 

Change in defense mechanisms following intensive treatment, as related to personality organization and gender

Author(s): Cramer P, Blatt SJ

Abstract

In this chapter we discuss how defense mechanisms change following intensive treatment and show how different defense mechanisms are related to gender and personality organization in psychiatric patients. In a large-scale study of psychological change following intensive treatment, Blatt, Ford, Berman, Cook, and Meyer (1988) found it useful to differentiate between the anaclitic and the introjective personality configurations. According to theory, there are two parallel developmental lines in personality development (Blatt & Shichman, 1983). One of these—the anaclitic—relates to the development of stable, mutually satisfying interpersonal relationships. The other—the introjective—is concerned with the development of a stable, realistic, and positive self-identity. These two lines interact throughout the course of development. Various forms of psychopathology have been conceptualized as an overemphasis and exaggeration of one of these developmental lines at the expense of the other. Thus, psychiatric patients with an anaclitic personality configuration (e.g., the infantile personality of a hysteric character) show an excessive and distorted preoccupation with establishing satisfying interpersonal relationships and a corresponding neglect of development of self. Patients with an introjective personality configuration (e.g., paranoid, obsessive-compulsive, guilty depression) manifest a peremptory and distorted concern around establishing and maintaining a consolidated definition of self, and a corresponding neglect of establishing meaningful interpersonal relationships. Recent findings (Blatt et al., 1988) indicate that these two groups of patients change in different ways during long-term, individual treatment.

KeywordsDefense MechanismInterpersonal RelationshipIntensive TreatmentInterpersonal RelationBorderline Personality Disorder

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Similar Articles

Defense mechanisms, 136: Theoretical, research, and clinical perspectives

Author(s): Hentschel U, Smith G, Draguns JG, Ehlers W

The wisdom of the ego

Author(s): Vaillant GE

Early change in maladaptive defense style and development of the therapeutic alliance

Author(s): Ambresin G, de Roten Y, Drapeau M, Despland JN

Patient defense/therapist interventions

Author(s): Winston B, Winston A, Samstag LW, Muran JC

A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research

Author(s): Hill C, Thompson BJ, Nutt-Williams E

Consensual qualitative research: An update

Author(s): Hill C, Knox S, Thompson BJ, Williams EN, Hess SA, et al.

Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for somatic disorders

Author(s): Abbass A, Kisely S, Kroenke K

Treating affect phobia: A manual for short-term dynamic psychotherapy

Author(s): McCullough L, Kuhn N, Andrews S, Kaplan A, Wolf J, et al.

Desensitization of conflicted feelings: Using the ATOS to measure early change in a single-case affect phobia therapy treatment

Author(s): Bhatia M, Gil Rodriguez M, Fowler DM, Godin JEG, Drapeau M, McCullough L

The effects of confrontation and clarification on patient affective and defensive responding

Author(s): Salerno M, Farber BA, McCullough L, Winston A, Trujillo M

How to address patients' defenses: A pilot study of the accuracy of defence interpretation and alliance

Author(s): Junod O, de Roten Y, Martinez E, Drapeau M, Despland JN

Accuracy of defense interpretations in three character types

Author(s): Perry JC, Petraglia J, Olson TR, Presniak MD, Metzger JA

Interpretation in projection

Author(s): Quinodoz D