Author(s): Qi H, Li S
A dose–response meta-analysis was carried out between Parkinson's disease (PD) risk, and coffee, tea and caffeine consumption.
MethodsA comprehensive search was carried out to identify eligible studies. The fixed or random effect model was used based on heterogeneity test. The dose–response relationship was assessed by restricted cubic spline.
ResultsA total of 13 articles involving 901 764 participants for coffee, eight articles involving 344 895 participants for tea and seven articles involving 492 724 participants for caffeine were included. A non-linear relationship was found between coffee consumption and PD risk overall, and the strength of protection reached the maximum at approximately 3 cups/day (smoking-adjusted relative risk: 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.65–0.81). A linear relationship was found between tea and caffeine consumption, and PD risk overall, and the smoking-adjusted risk of PD decreased by 26% and 17% for every two cups/day and 200 mg/day increments, respectively. The association of coffee and tea consumption with PD risk was stronger for men than that for women, and the association of caffeine consumption with PD risk was stronger for ever users of hormones than that for never users of hormones among postmenopausal women. The aforementioned associations were weaker for USA relative to Europe or Asia.
ConclusionsA linear dose-relationship for decreased PD risk with tea and caffeine consumption was found, whereas the strength of protection reached a maximum at approximately 3 cups/day for coffee consumption overall. Further studies are required to confirm the findings.
Referred From: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.12123
Author(s): Nehlig A, Daval JL, Debry G
Author(s): Majithia N
Author(s): Evans JC
Author(s): Bolton S, Null G
Author(s): Cano-Marquina A, Tarín JJ, Cano A
Author(s): Ding M, Bhupathiraju SN, Satija A, van Dam RM, Hu FB
Author(s): Juliano LM, Griffiths RR
Author(s): Robertson D, Wade D, Workman R, Woosley RL, Oateshttp JA
Author(s): Frary CD, Johnson RK, Wang MQ
Author(s): Barone JJ, Roberts HR
Author(s): Winston AP, Hardwick E, Jaberi N
Author(s): Verkhratsky A
Author(s): Holmgren P, Nordén-Pettersson L, Ahlner J
Author(s): Rodopoulos N, Wisén O, Norman A
Author(s): Uddin MS, Wali MW, Mamun AA, Asaduzzaman M, Amran MS, et al.
Author(s): Liguori A, Hughes JR, Grass JA
Author(s): James JE
Author(s): Vanderveen JE, Armstrong LE, Butterfield GE, Chenoweth WL, Dwyer JT, et al.
Author(s): Parsons WD, Neims AH
Author(s): Aranda JV, Cook CE, Gorman W, Collinge JM, Loughnan PM, et al.
Author(s): Aranda JV, Sitar DS, Parsons WD, Loughnan PM, Neims AH
Author(s): Finnegan D
Author(s): Coelho A, Fraichard S, Le Goff G, Faure P, Artur Y, Ferveur JF, Heydel JM
Author(s): Verbeeck RK
Author(s): Borycz J, Pereira MF, Melani A, Rodrigues RJ, Kofalvi A, et al.
Author(s): Baker WJ, Theologus GC
Author(s): Bolton S, Null G
Author(s): Chen JF, Chern Y
Author(s): Camilo O, Goldstein LB
Author(s): Yadav S, Gupta SP, Srivastava G, Srivastava PK, Singh MP
Author(s): Salvemini D, Kim SF, Mollace V
Author(s): Federico S, Spalluto G
Author(s): Chu YF, Chang WH, Black RM, Liu JR, Sompol P, et al.
Author(s): Sonsalla PK, Wong LY, Harris SL
Author(s): Palacios N, Gao X, McCullough ML
Author(s): Chen X, Ghribi O, Geiger JD
Author(s): Prasanthi JR, Dasari B, Marwarha G