Targeting postprandial hyperglycemia: a comparative study of insulinotropic agents in type 2 diabetes

Author(s): Carroll MF, Gutierrez A, Castro M, Tsewang D, Schade DS


This study was designed to compare the efficacy of three insulinotropic agents in the control of postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. Fifteen subjects with noninsulin-requiring type 2 diabetes were admitted to the General Clinical Research Center on four separate occasions. During the control study and following 7-10 d on each study medication, daylong glucose profiles were performed to investigate the effects of the assigned medication on postprandial hyperglycemia. During each admission, placebo or study medications were administered before three isocaloric meals as follows: immediate-release glipizide 30 min before breakfast and 30 min before supper, glipizide gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) 30 min before breakfast, or nateglinide 120 mg 10 min before breakfast, before lunch, and before supper. Blood was drawn for analysis of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide at -0.05, 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h relative to each test meal. Immediate-release glipizide, nateglinide, or glipizide GITS administration resulted in significantly lower integrated daylong (glucose area under the curve) and peak glucose levels, compared with placebo. There were no significant differences in the daylong integrated glucose levels among the three study medications. The peak postbreakfast glucose level (but not glucose area under the curve) was lower with nateglinide, compared with either immediate-release glipizide or glipizide GITS. Postlunch and postdinner integrated glucose levels were significantly lower with immediate-release glipizide or glipizide GITS, compared with nateglinide. C-peptide levels were significantly higher with immediate-release glipizide, compared with glipizide GITS. Insulin levels did not differ among the three study medications. Once-daily glipizide GITS, twice-daily immediate-release glipizide, or three-times-a-day administration of nateglinide results in equivalent control of postmeal hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. The decision to prescribe one of these three insulinotropic agents should be based on factors such as the patient's ability to comply with complex dosing regimens, the need to control fasting hyperglycemia, the risk of interprandial hypoglycemia, and pharmacoeconomic considerations, rather than postprandial glucose-lowering efficacy.

Similar Articles

Inhibitors of the rate of carbohydrate and lipid absorption by the intestine

Author(s): Puls W, Krause HP, Müller L, Schutt H, Sitt R, et al.

Trans-chalcone: a novel small molecule inhibitor of mammalian alpha-amylase

Author(s): Najafian M, Ebrahim-Habibi A, Hezareh N, Yaghmaei P, Parivar K, et al.

Plant alpha-amylase inhibitors and their interaction with insect alpha-amylases

Author(s): Franco OL, Rigden DJ, Melo FR, Grossi-De-Sá MF

Analgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of PinusroxburghiiSarg

Author(s): Kaushik D, Kumar A, Kaushik P, Rana AC

Anticonvulsant activity of alcoholic extract of bark of PinusroxburghiiSarg

Author(s): Kaushik D, Kumar A, Kaushik P, Rana AC

GC-MS Analysis and Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oil of PinusroxburghiiSarg

Author(s): Kaushik D, Kaushik P, Kumar A, Rana AC, Sharma C, et al.

Evaluation of Anticancer Activity of PinusroxburghiiSarg

Author(s): Kaushik P, Khokra S, Rana A, Kaushik D

The phenols and prodelphinidins of white clover flowers

Author(s): Foo LY, Lu Y, Molan AL, Woodfield DR, McNabb WC

13C CP/MAS NMR studies of flavonoids

Author(s): Wawer I, Zielinska A