Author(s): Middaugh LD, Dow-Edwards D, Li AA
This report describes the results of a survey designed to evaluate the contribution of F1 neurobehavioral testing to hazard identification and characterization in safety assessment studies. (To review the details of the distributed survey, please see the Supplementary Data for this article on the journal’s Web site.) The survey provided information about studies completed in industrial laboratories in the United States, Europe, and Japan since 1990 on 174 compounds. The types of compounds included were pharmaceutical (81%), agricultural (7%), industrial (1%), or were undefined (10%). Information collected included the intended use of the test agent, general study design and methodology, the types and characteristics of F1 behavioral evaluations, and the frequency with which agents affected neurobehavioral parameters in comparison to other F0 and F1 generation parameters. F1 general toxicology parameters such as mortality, pre- and postweaning body weight, and food intake were assessed in most studies and were affected more frequently than other parameters by the test agents. F1 behavioral parameters were assessed less consistently across studies, and were less frequently affected by the agents tested. Although affected by agents less often than general toxicology parameters, F1 behavioral parameters along with other parameters defined the no-observed-effect level (NOEL) in 17/113 (15%) of studies and solely defined the NOEL in 3/113 (2.6%) of studies. Thus, F1 behavioral parameters sometimes improved on the standard toxicological measures of hazard identification. While not detecting agent effects as readily as some measures, the F1 behavioral parameters provide information about agent effects on specialized functions of developing offspring not provided by other standard measures of toxicity. The survey results emphasize the need for further research into the methods of behavioral assessment as well as the mechanisms underlying the neurobehavioral alterations.
Author(s): Colborn T
Author(s): Herbert MR
Author(s): Rauh VA, Garfinkel R, Perera FP, Andrews HF, Hoepner L, et al.
Author(s): Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ
Author(s): Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ
Author(s): Makris SL, Raffaele K, Allen S, Bowers WJ, Hasset U
Author(s): Cooper RL, Lamb JC, Barlow SM
Author(s): Doe JE, Boobis AR, Blacker A, Dellarco V, Doerrer NG, et al.
Author(s): Couillard-Despres S, Quehl E, Altendorfer K, Bentley K, Brady AM, et al.
Author(s): Hill EJ, Woehrling EK, Prince M, Coleman MD
Author(s): Hou Z, Zhang J, Schwartz MP, Stewart R, Page CD, et al.
Author(s): Laurenza I, Pallocca G, Mennecozzi M, Scelfo B, Pamies D, et al.
Author(s): Menzner AK, AbolpourMofrad S, Friedrich O, Gilbert DF
Author(s): Pallocca G, Fabbri M, Sacco MG, Gribaldo L, Pamies D, et al.
Author(s): Haile Y, Fu W, Shi B, Westaway D, Baker G, et al.
Author(s): Andrews PW
Author(s): Coyne L, Shan M, Przyborski SA, Hirakawa R, Halliwell RF
Author(s): Kuenzel K, Friedrich O, Gilbert DF
Author(s): Pleasure SJ, Lee VM
Author(s): Pleasure SJ, Page C, Lee VM
Author(s): Stewart R, Coyne L, Lako M, Halliwell RF, Przyborski SA
Author(s): Hsu TC, Liu KK, Chang HC, Hwang E, Chao JI
Author(s): Megiorni F, Mora B, Indovina P, Mazzilli MC
Author(s): Paquet-Durand F, Tan S, Bicker G
Author(s): Podrygajlo G, Tegenge MA, Gierse A
Author(s): Yao ZX, Han Z, Xu J, Greeson J, Lecanu L, et al.
Author(s): AbolpourMofrad S, Kuenzel K, Friedrich O, Gilbert DF