Live cell imaging distinguishes bona fide human iPS cells from partially reprogrammed cells

Author(s): Chan EM, Ratanasirintrawoot S, Park IH, Manos PD, Loh YH, et al.

Abstract

Somatic cells can be reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells by enforced expression of transcription factors. Using serial live imaging of human fibroblasts undergoing reprogramming, we identified distinct colony types that morphologically resemble embryonic stem (ES) cells yet differ in molecular phenotype and differentiation potential. By analyzing expression of pluripotency markers, methylation at the OCT4 and NANOG promoters and differentiation into teratomas, we determined that only one colony type represents true iPS cells, whereas the others represent reprogramming intermediates. Proviral silencing and expression of TRA-1-60, DNMT3B and REX1 can be used to distinguish the fully reprogrammed state, whereas alkaline phosphatase, SSEA-4, GDF3, hTERT and NANOG are insufficient as markers. We also show that reprogramming using chemically defined medium favors formation of fully reprogrammed over partially reprogrammed colonies. Our data define molecular markers of the fully reprogrammed state and highlight the need for rigorous characterization and standardization of putative iPS cells.

Similar Articles

Naive and primed pluripotent states

Author(s): Nichols J, Smith A

MicroRNAs: key regulators of stem cells

Author(s): Gangaraju VK, Lin H

Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse

Author(s): Stadtfeld M, Maherali N, Breault DT, Hochedlinger K

Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution

Author(s): Maherali N, Sridharan R, Xie W, Utikal J, Eminli S, et al.

Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells

Author(s): Kim K, Doi A, Wen B, Ng K, Zhao R, et al.

Hotspots of aberrant epigenomic reprogramming in human induced pluripotent stem cells

Author(s): Lister R, Pelizzola M, Kida YS, Hawkins RD, Nery JR, et al.

Immunogenicity of induced pluripotent stem cells

Author(s): Zhao T, Zhang ZN, Rong Z, Xu Y

Nuclear transfer to eggs and oocytes

Author(s): Gurdon JB, Wilmut I

CAF-1 is essential for heterochromatin organization in pluripotent embryonic cells

Author(s): Houlard M, Berlivet S, Probst AV, Quivy JP, Héry P, et al.

Acetylation-dependent chromatin reorganization by BRDT, a testis-specific bromodomain-containing protein

Author(s): Pivot-Pajot C, Caron C, Govin J, Vion A, Rousseaux S, et al.

Unique and independent roles for MLL in adult hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors

Author(s): Jude CD, Climer L, Xu D, Artinger E, Fisher JK, et al.

Histone H4-K16 acetylation controls chromatin structure and protein interactions

Author(s): Shogren-Knaak M, Ishii H, Sun JM, Pazin MJ, Davie JR, et al.

Modelling pathogenesis and treatment of familial dysautonomia using patient-specific iPSCs

Author(s): Lee G, Papapetrou EP, Kim H, Chambers SM, Tomishima MJ, et al.

Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell models for long-QT syndrome

Author(s): Moretti A, Bellin M, Welling A, Jung CB, Lam JT, et al.

Modelling the long QT syndrome with induced pluripotent stem cells

Author(s): Itzhaki I, Maizels L, Huber I, Zwi-Dantsis L, Caspi O, et al.